Latvia vs Mali: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Latvia
563,600 hectares
in 2025
Mali
527,330 hectares
in 2025
Latvia rank
53rd
Mali rank
56th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Latvia
- Mali
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 563,600 hectares against 527,330 hectares in Mali, a difference of 36,270 hectares.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 53rd and Mali ranks 56th of 185 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 318,635 hectares | 8,021 hectares | 310,614 hectares | Latvia |
| 2000s | 325,020 hectares | 111,130 hectares | 213,891 hectares | Latvia |
| 2010s | 416,918 hectares | 374,612 hectares | 42,306 hectares | Latvia |
| 2020s | 552,815 hectares | 509,150 hectares | 43,665 hectares | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Latvia or Mali?
- Latvia, at 563,600 hectares against 527,330 hectares in Mali as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Latvia and Mali?
- 36,270 hectares, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mali?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Mali rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Latvia ranks 53rd and Mali ranks 56th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.