Latvia vs Morocco: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Latvia
563,600 hectares
in 2025
Morocco
586,820 hectares
in 2025
Latvia rank
53rd
Morocco rank
52nd
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Latvia
- Morocco
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 586,820 hectares against 563,600 hectares in Latvia, a difference of 23,220 hectares.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Morocco has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 53rd and Morocco ranks 52nd of 185 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 318,635 hectares | 511,779 hectares | 193,144 hectares | Morocco |
| 2000s | 325,020 hectares | 542,168 hectares | 217,147 hectares | Morocco |
| 2010s | 416,918 hectares | 553,179 hectares | 136,261 hectares | Morocco |
| 2020s | 552,815 hectares | 580,655 hectares | 27,840 hectares | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Latvia or Morocco?
- Morocco, at 586,820 hectares against 563,600 hectares in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Latvia and Morocco?
- 23,220 hectares, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Morocco?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Morocco rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Latvia ranks 53rd and Morocco ranks 52nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.