Latvia vs Tanzania: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Latvia
563,600 hectares
in 2025
Tanzania
553,040 hectares
in 2025
Latvia rank
53rd
Tanzania rank
54th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Latvia
- Tanzania
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 563,600 hectares against 553,040 hectares in Tanzania, a difference of 10,560 hectares.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tanzania ahead.
Latvia ranks 53rd and Tanzania ranks 54th of 185 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 318,635 hectares | 553,040 hectares | 234,405 hectares | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 325,020 hectares | 553,040 hectares | 228,020 hectares | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 416,918 hectares | 553,040 hectares | 136,122 hectares | Tanzania |
| 2020s | 552,815 hectares | 553,040 hectares | 225 hectares | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Latvia or Tanzania?
- Latvia, at 563,600 hectares against 553,040 hectares in Tanzania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Latvia and Tanzania?
- 10,560 hectares, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Tanzania?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Tanzania rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Latvia ranks 53rd and Tanzania ranks 54th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.