Malawi vs Slovenia: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Malawi
59,030 hectares
in 2025
Slovenia
69,520 hectares
in 2025
Malawi rank
114th
Slovenia rank
113th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Malawi
  • Slovenia
050.0k100.0k150.0k199020072025

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 69,520 hectares against 59,030 hectares in Malawi, a difference of 10,490 hectares.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 114th and Slovenia ranks 113th of 185 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 127,495 hectares 64,710 hectares 62,785 hectares Malawi
2000s 108,460 hectares 64,710 hectares 43,750 hectares Malawi
2010s 87,280 hectares 65,166 hectares 22,114 hectares Malawi
2020s 67,365 hectares 66,980 hectares 385 hectares Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Malawi or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 69,520 hectares against 59,030 hectares in Malawi as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Malawi and Slovenia?
10,490 hectares, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Slovenia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
How do Malawi and Slovenia rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Malawi ranks 114th and Slovenia ranks 113th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Slovenia: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/malawi/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/malawi/slovenia/">Malawi vs Slovenia: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed