Mali vs Tanzania: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Mali
527,330 hectares
in 2025
Tanzania
553,040 hectares
in 2025
Mali rank
56th
Tanzania rank
54th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Mali
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 553,040 hectares against 527,330 hectares in Mali, a difference of 25,710 hectares.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Mali ranks 56th and Tanzania ranks 54th of 185 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,359 hectares | 553,040 hectares | 545,681 hectares | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 111,130 hectares | 553,040 hectares | 441,910 hectares | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 374,612 hectares | 553,040 hectares | 178,428 hectares | Tanzania |
| 2020s | 509,150 hectares | 553,040 hectares | 43,890 hectares | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Mali or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 553,040 hectares against 527,330 hectares in Mali as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Mali and Tanzania?
- 25,710 hectares, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Tanzania?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Mali and Tanzania rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Mali ranks 56th and Tanzania ranks 54th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.