Mauritania vs Nepal: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Mauritania
403,660 hectares
in 2025
Nepal
370,010 hectares
in 2025
Mauritania rank
61st
Nepal rank
64th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Mauritania
  • Nepal
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199020072025

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 403,660 hectares against 370,010 hectares in Nepal, a difference of 33,650 hectares.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nepal ahead.

Mauritania ranks 61st and Nepal ranks 64th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Nepal Difference Ahead
1990s 136,958 hectares 370,310 hectares 233,352 hectares Nepal
2000s 224,394 hectares 370,373 hectares 145,980 hectares Nepal
2010s 311,828 hectares 370,287 hectares 58,459 hectares Nepal
2020s 381,790 hectares 370,010 hectares 11,780 hectares Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Mauritania or Nepal?
Mauritania, at 403,660 hectares against 370,010 hectares in Nepal as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Mauritania and Nepal?
33,650 hectares, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Nepal?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Mauritania and Nepal rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Mauritania ranks 61st and Nepal ranks 64th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Nepal: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/mauritania/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/mauritania/nepal/">Mauritania vs Nepal: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed