Mauritania vs Rwanda: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Mauritania
403,660 hectares
in 2025
Rwanda
397,350 hectares
in 2025
Mauritania rank
61st
Rwanda rank
62nd

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Mauritania
  • Rwanda
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199020072025

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 403,660 hectares against 397,350 hectares in Rwanda, a difference of 6,310 hectares.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.

Mauritania ranks 61st and Rwanda ranks 62nd of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 136,958 hectares 239,592 hectares 102,634 hectares Rwanda
2000s 224,394 hectares 261,238 hectares 36,845 hectares Rwanda
2010s 311,828 hectares 313,137 hectares 1,309 hectares Rwanda
2020s 381,790 hectares 377,300 hectares 4,490 hectares Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Mauritania or Rwanda?
Mauritania, at 403,660 hectares against 397,350 hectares in Rwanda as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Mauritania and Rwanda?
6,310 hectares, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Rwanda?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Mauritania and Rwanda rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Mauritania ranks 61st and Rwanda ranks 62nd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Rwanda: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/mauritania/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/mauritania/rwanda/">Mauritania vs Rwanda: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed