Mauritius vs Micronesia (country): Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Mauritius
17,990 hectares
in 2025
Micronesia (country)
14,210 hectares
in 2025
Mauritius rank
137th
Micronesia (country) rank
139th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Mauritius
  • Micronesia (country)
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k199020072025

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 17,990 hectares against 14,210 hectares in Micronesia (country), a difference of 3,780 hectares.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.3 times Micronesia (country)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Micronesia (country) ahead.

Mauritius ranks 137th and Micronesia (country) ranks 139th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 3 and Micronesia (country) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Micronesia (country) Difference Ahead
1990s 17,680 hectares 18,740 hectares 1,060 hectares Micronesia (country)
2000s 18,083 hectares 15,871 hectares 2,212 hectares Mauritius
2010s 18,013 hectares 14,210 hectares 3,803 hectares Mauritius
2020s 17,990 hectares 14,210 hectares 3,780 hectares Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Mauritius or Micronesia (country)?
Mauritius, at 17,990 hectares against 14,210 hectares in Micronesia (country) as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Mauritius and Micronesia (country)?
3,780 hectares, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Micronesia (country)?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Mauritius and Micronesia (country) rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Mauritius ranks 137th and Micronesia (country) ranks 139th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Micronesia (country): Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/mauritius/micronesia-fed-sts/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/mauritius/micronesia-fed-sts/">Mauritius vs Micronesia (country): Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed