Mexico vs Sudan: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Mexico
134,210 hectares
in 2025
Sudan
130,250 hectares
in 2025
Mexico rank
92nd
Sudan rank
95th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Mexico
- Sudan
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 134,210 hectares against 130,250 hectares in Sudan, a difference of 3,960 hectares.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Mexico ranks 92nd and Sudan ranks 95th of 185 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 102,696 hectares | 130,250 hectares | 27,554 hectares | Sudan |
| 2020s | 125,950 hectares | 130,250 hectares | 4,300 hectares | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Mexico or Sudan?
- Mexico, at 134,210 hectares against 130,250 hectares in Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Mexico and Sudan?
- 3,960 hectares, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Mexico and Sudan rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Mexico ranks 92nd and Sudan ranks 95th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.