Moldova vs Serbia: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Moldova
209,600 hectares
in 2025
Serbia
224,080 hectares
in 2025
Moldova rank
80th
Serbia rank
79th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Moldova
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 224,080 hectares against 209,600 hectares in Moldova, a difference of 14,480 hectares.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Moldova's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Moldova ahead.
Moldova ranks 80th and Serbia ranks 79th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 197,750 hectares | 180,938 hectares | 16,812 hectares | Moldova |
| 2010s | 215,190 hectares | 198,197 hectares | 16,993 hectares | Moldova |
| 2020s | 210,400 hectares | 217,920 hectares | 7,520 hectares | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Moldova or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 224,080 hectares against 209,600 hectares in Moldova as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Moldova and Serbia?
- 14,480 hectares, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Serbia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Moldova and Serbia rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Moldova ranks 80th and Serbia ranks 79th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.