Mozambique vs Saudi Arabia: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Mozambique
84,260 hectares
in 2025
Saudi Arabia
75,590 hectares
in 2025
Mozambique rank
108th
Saudi Arabia rank
109th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Mozambique
  • Saudi Arabia
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199020072025

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 84,260 hectares against 75,590 hectares in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 8,670 hectares.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Mozambique ranks 108th and Saudi Arabia ranks 109th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1990s 38,000 hectares 68,090 hectares 30,090 hectares Saudi Arabia
2000s 45,488 hectares 68,090 hectares 22,602 hectares Saudi Arabia
2010s 64,241 hectares 68,090 hectares 3,849 hectares Saudi Arabia
2020s 79,265 hectares 71,840 hectares 7,425 hectares Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Mozambique or Saudi Arabia?
Mozambique, at 84,260 hectares against 75,590 hectares in Saudi Arabia as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Mozambique and Saudi Arabia?
8,670 hectares, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Saudi Arabia?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Mozambique and Saudi Arabia rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Mozambique ranks 108th and Saudi Arabia ranks 109th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed