Netherlands vs Zimbabwe: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Netherlands
326,820 hectares
in 2025
Zimbabwe
320,750 hectares
in 2025
Netherlands rank
66th
Zimbabwe rank
68th

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Netherlands
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199020072025

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 326,820 hectares against 320,750 hectares in Zimbabwe, a difference of 6,070 hectares.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Netherlands ranks 66th and Zimbabwe ranks 68th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Netherlands averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 303,561 hectares 378,386 hectares 74,826 hectares Zimbabwe
2000s 322,132 hectares 353,752 hectares 31,620 hectares Zimbabwe
2010s 327,199 hectares 334,069 hectares 6,870 hectares Zimbabwe
2020s 325,825 hectares 323,835 hectares 1,990 hectares Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Netherlands or Zimbabwe?
Netherlands, at 326,820 hectares against 320,750 hectares in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Netherlands and Zimbabwe?
6,070 hectares, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Zimbabwe?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Netherlands and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Netherlands ranks 66th and Zimbabwe ranks 68th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands vs Zimbabwe: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/netherlands/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/netherlands/zimbabwe/">Netherlands vs Zimbabwe: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed