Nicaragua vs Norway: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted

Nicaragua
118,396 hectares
in 2023
Norway
113,110 hectares
in 2025
Nicaragua rank
99th
Norway rank
102nd

Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Norway
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k199020072025

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 118,396 hectares against 113,110 hectares in Norway, a difference of 5,286 hectares.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Norway ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 99th and Norway ranks 102nd of 185 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Norway Difference Ahead
2000s 13,070 hectares 115,540 hectares 102,470 hectares Norway
2010s 59,711 hectares 113,884 hectares 54,173 hectares Norway
2020s 108,283 hectares 113,110 hectares 4,827 hectares Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Nicaragua or Norway?
Nicaragua, at 118,396 hectares against 113,110 hectares in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Nicaragua and Norway?
5,286 hectares, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Norway?
23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Nicaragua and Norway rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
Nicaragua ranks 99th and Norway ranks 102nd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Norway: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/nicaragua/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-primary-planted/nicaragua/norway/">Nicaragua vs Norway: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Unit
hectares
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
186 places, 6,421 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed