Pakistan vs Sudan: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Pakistan
126,740 hectares
in 2025
Sudan
130,250 hectares
in 2025
Pakistan rank
96th
Sudan rank
95th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Pakistan
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 130,250 hectares against 126,740 hectares in Pakistan, a difference of 3,510 hectares.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Pakistan ranks 96th and Sudan ranks 95th of 185 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 111,869 hectares | 130,250 hectares | 18,381 hectares | Sudan |
| 2020s | 122,270 hectares | 130,250 hectares | 7,980 hectares | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Pakistan or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 130,250 hectares against 126,740 hectares in Pakistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Pakistan and Sudan?
- 3,510 hectares, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Pakistan and Sudan rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Pakistan ranks 96th and Sudan ranks 95th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.