Paraguay vs Zimbabwe: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Paraguay
321,690 hectares
in 2025
Zimbabwe
320,750 hectares
in 2025
Paraguay rank
67th
Zimbabwe rank
68th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Paraguay
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 321,690 hectares against 320,750 hectares in Zimbabwe, a difference of 940 hectares.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Paraguay ranks 67th and Zimbabwe ranks 68th of 185 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 26,065 hectares | 330,085 hectares | 304,020 hectares | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 186,910 hectares | 323,835 hectares | 136,925 hectares | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Paraguay or Zimbabwe?
- Paraguay, at 321,690 hectares against 320,750 hectares in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Paraguay and Zimbabwe?
- 940 hectares, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Zimbabwe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2025.
- How do Paraguay and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Paraguay ranks 67th and Zimbabwe ranks 68th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.