Romania vs South Sudan: Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted
Romania
676,440 hectares
in 2025
South Sudan
715,700 hectares
in 2025
Romania rank
47th
South Sudan rank
44th
Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted over time
- Romania
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 715,700 hectares against 676,440 hectares in Romania, a difference of 39,260 hectares.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Romania ranks 47th and South Sudan ranks 44th of 185 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 878,662 hectares | 715,700 hectares | 162,962 hectares | Romania |
| 2020s | 785,755 hectares | 715,700 hectares | 70,055 hectares | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted, Romania or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 715,700 hectares against 676,440 hectares in Romania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted between Romania and South Sudan?
- 39,260 hectares, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and South Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Romania and South Sudan rank globally for forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted?
- Romania ranks 47th and South Sudan ranks 44th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Forest area by type: naturally regenerating vs. planted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.