Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Pitcairn: Forest land — Area

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
2.02 1000 ha
in 2025
Pitcairn
3.69 1000 ha
in 2025
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
200th
Pitcairn rank
197th

Forest land — Area over time

  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
  • Pitcairn
01234199020072025

How they compare

Pitcairn currently reports 3.69 1000 ha against 2.02 1000 ha in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, a difference of 1.67 1000 ha.

That makes Pitcairn's figure about 1.8 times Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Pitcairn has been ahead every year.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 200th and Pitcairn ranks 197th of 215 countries.

Pitcairn has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha Pitcairn Difference Ahead
1990s 2.02 1000 ha 3.69 1000 ha 1.67 1000 ha Pitcairn
2000s 2.02 1000 ha 3.69 1000 ha 1.67 1000 ha Pitcairn
2010s 2.02 1000 ha 3.69 1000 ha 1.67 1000 ha Pitcairn
2020s 2.02 1000 ha 3.69 1000 ha 1.67 1000 ha Pitcairn

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — area, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Pitcairn?
Pitcairn, at 3.69 1000 ha against 2.02 1000 ha in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — area between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Pitcairn?
1.67 1000 ha, with Pitcairn ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Pitcairn?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Pitcairn rank globally for forest land — area?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 200th and Pitcairn ranks 197th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest land — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Pitcairn: Forest land — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-area/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/pitcairn/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-area/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/pitcairn/">Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Pitcairn: Forest land — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
267 places, 9,311 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.