Australia vs Pakistan: Forest rents
Australia
0.1%
in 2021
Pakistan
0.1%
in 2021
Australia rank
110th
Pakistan rank
108th
Forest rents over time
- Australia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Australia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 110th and Pakistan ranks 108th of 212 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.2% | Pakistan |
| 1980s | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | Australia |
| 1990s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, Australia or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Australia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between Australia and Pakistan?
- 0.0%, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Pakistan?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Australia and Pakistan rank globally for forest rents?
- Australia ranks 110th and Pakistan ranks 108th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.