Australia vs Peru: Forest rents
Australia
0.1%
in 2021
Peru
0.1%
in 2021
Australia rank
110th
Peru rank
112th
Forest rents over time
- Australia
- Peru
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Peru, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Peru ahead.
Australia ranks 110th and Peru ranks 112th of 212 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.1% | Peru |
| 1980s | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.2% | Peru |
| 1990s | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.1% | Peru |
| 2000s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | Peru |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.0% | Peru |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, Australia or Peru?
- Australia, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Peru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between Australia and Peru?
- 0.0%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Peru?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Australia and Peru rank globally for forest rents?
- Australia ranks 110th and Peru ranks 112th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.