Belarus vs New Zealand: Forest rents
Belarus
1.0%
in 2021
New Zealand
1.0%
in 2021
Belarus rank
56th
New Zealand rank
58th
Forest rents over time
- Belarus
- New Zealand
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was New Zealand ahead.
Belarus ranks 56th and New Zealand ranks 58th of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.2% | 1.0% | 0.2% | Belarus |
| 2000s | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.1% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.0% | Belarus |
| 2020s | 1.1% | 1.0% | 0.1% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, Belarus or New Zealand?
- Belarus, at 1.0% against 1.0% in New Zealand as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between Belarus and New Zealand?
- 0.0%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and New Zealand?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
- How do Belarus and New Zealand rank globally for forest rents?
- Belarus ranks 56th and New Zealand ranks 58th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.