Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Nepal: Forest rents
Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.5%
in 2021
Nepal
0.5%
in 2021
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
74th
Nepal rank
71st
Forest rents over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 0.5% against 0.5% in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Nepal ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 74th and Nepal ranks 71st of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8% | 1.3% | 0.5% | Nepal |
| 2000s | 0.6% | 1.1% | 0.4% | Nepal |
| 2010s | 0.6% | 0.9% | 0.3% | Nepal |
| 2020s | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 0.5% against 0.5% in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Nepal?
- 0.0%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Nepal?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2021.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Nepal rank globally for forest rents?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 74th and Nepal ranks 71st of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.