Chile vs El Salvador: Forest rents
Chile
0.6%
in 2021
El Salvador
0.5%
in 2021
Chile rank
67th
El Salvador rank
70th
Forest rents over time
- Chile
- El Salvador
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.6% against 0.5% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was El Salvador ahead.
Chile ranks 67th and El Salvador ranks 70th of 214 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and El Salvador in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.1% | El Salvador |
| 1980s | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.1% | El Salvador |
| 1990s | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.0% | Chile |
| 2000s | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.7% | 0.9% | 0.2% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 0.8% | 0.6% | 0.1% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, Chile or El Salvador?
- Chile, at 0.6% against 0.5% in El Salvador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between Chile and El Salvador?
- 0.1%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and El Salvador?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Chile and El Salvador rank globally for forest rents?
- Chile ranks 67th and El Salvador ranks 70th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.