Chile vs South Africa: Forest rents
Chile
0.6%
in 2021
South Africa
0.6%
in 2021
Chile rank
67th
South Africa rank
68th
Forest rents over time
- Chile
- South Africa
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.6% against 0.6% in South Africa, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was South Africa ahead.
Chile ranks 67th and South Africa ranks 68th of 214 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.0% | South Africa |
| 1980s | 0.6% | 0.9% | 0.2% | South Africa |
| 1990s | 0.7% | 0.9% | 0.1% | South Africa |
| 2000s | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.2% | South Africa |
| 2010s | 0.7% | 0.6% | 0.1% | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.1% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, Chile or South Africa?
- Chile, at 0.6% against 0.6% in South Africa as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between Chile and South Africa?
- 0.0%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and South Africa?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Chile and South Africa rank globally for forest rents?
- Chile ranks 67th and South Africa ranks 68th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.