Comoros vs Zimbabwe: Forest rents
Comoros
1.6%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
1.8%
in 2021
Comoros rank
44th
Zimbabwe rank
41st
Forest rents over time
- Comoros
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1.8% against 1.6% in Comoros, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Comoros ranks 44th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 212 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.7% | 1.5% | 0.8% | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 1.2% | 2.6% | 1.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 1.5% | 4.7% | 3.3% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 1.9% | 2.9% | 0.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 1.6% | 2.0% | 0.4% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, Comoros or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1.8% against 1.6% in Comoros as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between Comoros and Zimbabwe?
- 0.2%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Zimbabwe?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2021.
- How do Comoros and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest rents?
- Comoros ranks 44th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.