How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Eritrea?

20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.

Where does this data come from?

The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Eritrea: Forest rents

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)

0.2%

in 2021

Eritrea

2.3%

in 2011

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank

30th

Eritrea rank

32nd

Forest rents over time

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
Eritrea

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 2.3% against 0.2% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 2.1%.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 14.7 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 30th and Eritrea ranks 32nd of 47 groups.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)	Eritrea	Difference	Ahead
1990s	1.3%	6.0%	4.7%	Eritrea
2000s	0.5%	3.7%	3.2%	Eritrea
2010s	0.4%	2.4%	2.0%	Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest rents, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Eritrea?: Eritrea, at 2.3% against 0.2% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2011.
What is the difference in forest rents between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Eritrea?: 2.1%, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Eritrea?: 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Eritrea rank globally for forest rents?: East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 30th and Eritrea ranks 32nd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?: The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Eritrea: Forest rents. Statizoid, drawing on The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-rents-percent-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-rents-percent-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/eritrea/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Eritrea: Forest rents</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Forest rents (% of GDP)
Unit: % of GDP
Source: The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 262 places, 11,714 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.