East Asia & Pacific vs Eritrea: Forest rents
East Asia & Pacific
0.1%
in 2021
Eritrea
2.3%
in 2011
East Asia & Pacific rank
35th
Eritrea rank
32nd
Forest rents over time
- East Asia & Pacific
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 2.3% against 0.1% in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 2.2%.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 18.2 times East Asia & Pacific's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was East Asia & Pacific ahead.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 35th and Eritrea ranks 32nd of 47 groups.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2% | 6.0% | 5.7% | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0.2% | 3.7% | 3.5% | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0.2% | 2.4% | 2.2% | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, East Asia & Pacific or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 2.3% against 0.1% in East Asia & Pacific as of 2011.
- What is the difference in forest rents between East Asia & Pacific and Eritrea?
- 2.2%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Eritrea?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do East Asia & Pacific and Eritrea rank globally for forest rents?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 35th and Eritrea ranks 32nd of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.