Equatorial Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Forest rents
Equatorial Guinea
1.9%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
1.8%
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea rank
38th
Zimbabwe rank
41st
Forest rents over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1.9% against 1.8% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 212 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 5.9% | 1.1% | 4.8% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1980s | 21.7% | 1.5% | 20.2% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1990s | 18.9% | 2.6% | 16.2% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 1.8% | 4.7% | 2.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 1.0% | 2.9% | 1.8% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 2.1% | 2.0% | 0.0% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, Equatorial Guinea or Zimbabwe?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 1.9% against 1.8% in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest rents?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.