Eritrea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Forest rents
Eritrea
2.3%
in 2011
Tanzania, United Republic of
2.4%
in 2021
Eritrea rank
32nd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
31st
Forest rents over time
- Eritrea
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 2.4% against 2.3% in Eritrea, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
Eritrea ranks 32nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 31st of 212 countries.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.0% | 9.6% | 3.6% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2000s | 3.7% | 4.3% | 0.7% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2010s | 2.4% | 3.9% | 1.5% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, Eritrea or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 2.4% against 2.3% in Eritrea as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between Eritrea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.1%, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for forest rents?
- Eritrea ranks 32nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 31st of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.