Eswatini vs IBRD only: Forest rents
Eswatini
2.9%
in 2021
IBRD only
0.2%
in 2021
Eswatini rank
24th
IBRD only rank
27th
Forest rents over time
- Eswatini
- IBRD only
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 2.9% against 0.2% in IBRD only, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 14.4 times IBRD only's.
Across all 52 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 24th and IBRD only ranks 27th of 212 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | IBRD only | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 8.7% | 1.0% | 7.7% | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 9.7% | 0.9% | 8.9% | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 4.1% | 0.6% | 3.5% | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 2.5% | 0.3% | 2.1% | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 2.9% | 0.3% | 2.6% | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 3.1% | 0.2% | 2.9% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, Eswatini or IBRD only?
- Eswatini, at 2.9% against 0.2% in IBRD only as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between Eswatini and IBRD only?
- 2.7%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and IBRD only?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Eswatini and IBRD only rank globally for forest rents?
- Eswatini ranks 24th and IBRD only ranks 27th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.