Europe & Central Asia vs Zimbabwe: Forest rents
Europe & Central Asia
0.1%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
1.8%
in 2021
Europe & Central Asia rank
40th
Zimbabwe rank
41st
Forest rents over time
- Europe & Central Asia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1.8% against 0.1% in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 27.1 times Europe & Central Asia's.
Across all 52 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Europe & Central Asia ranks 40th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 47 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe & Central Asia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.1% | 1.2% | 1.1% | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 0.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 0.1% | 2.6% | 2.5% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 4.7% | 4.7% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 2.9% | 2.8% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 2.0% | 2.0% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, Europe & Central Asia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1.8% against 0.1% in Europe & Central Asia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between Europe & Central Asia and Zimbabwe?
- 1.7%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Zimbabwe?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Europe & Central Asia and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest rents?
- Europe & Central Asia ranks 40th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.