High income vs Malaysia: Forest rents
High income
0.1%
in 2021
Malaysia
1.7%
in 2021
High income rank
41st
Malaysia rank
42nd
Forest rents over time
- High income
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 1.7% against 0.1% in High income, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 29.6 times High income's.
Across all 52 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
High income ranks 41st and Malaysia ranks 42nd of 45 groups.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | High income | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.1% | 23.1% | 22.9% | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 0.1% | 17.8% | 17.7% | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 0.1% | 10.0% | 9.9% | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 3.9% | 3.8% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 2.1% | 2.1% | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 1.8% | 1.7% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, High income or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 1.7% against 0.1% in High income as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between High income and Malaysia?
- 1.6%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Malaysia?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do High income and Malaysia rank globally for forest rents?
- High income ranks 41st and Malaysia ranks 42nd of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.