High income vs Zimbabwe: Forest rents
High income
0.1%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
1.8%
in 2021
High income rank
41st
Zimbabwe rank
41st
Forest rents over time
- High income
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1.8% against 0.1% in High income, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 31.6 times High income's.
Across all 52 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
High income ranks 41st and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 45 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | High income | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.1% | 1.2% | 1.1% | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 0.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 0.1% | 2.6% | 2.5% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 4.7% | 4.7% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 2.9% | 2.8% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 2.0% | 2.0% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, High income or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1.8% against 0.1% in High income as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between High income and Zimbabwe?
- 1.7%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Zimbabwe?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do High income and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest rents?
- High income ranks 41st and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.