IBRD only vs South Sudan: Forest rents
IBRD only
0.2%
in 2021
South Sudan
2.6%
in 2015
IBRD only rank
27th
South Sudan rank
28th
Forest rents over time
- IBRD only
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 2.6% against 0.2% in IBRD only, a difference of 2.4%.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 13.3 times IBRD only's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was IBRD only ahead.
IBRD only ranks 27th and South Sudan ranks 28th of 45 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, IBRD only averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.3% | IBRD only |
| 2010s | 0.3% | 1.6% | 1.3% | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, IBRD only or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 2.6% against 0.2% in IBRD only as of 2015.
- What is the difference in forest rents between IBRD only and South Sudan?
- 2.4%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do IBRD only and South Sudan rank globally for forest rents?
- IBRD only ranks 27th and South Sudan ranks 28th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.