IBRD only vs Sudan: Forest rents
IBRD only
0.2%
in 2021
Sudan
2.8%
in 2021
IBRD only rank
27th
Sudan rank
26th
Forest rents over time
- IBRD only
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 2.8% against 0.2% in IBRD only, a difference of 2.6%.
That makes Sudan's figure about 14.2 times IBRD only's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was IBRD only ahead.
IBRD only ranks 27th and Sudan ranks 26th of 45 groups.
Across the 6 decades both report, IBRD only averaged higher in 4 and Sudan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.0% | 0.0% | 1.0% | IBRD only |
| 1980s | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.9% | IBRD only |
| 1990s | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.6% | IBRD only |
| 2000s | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.3% | IBRD only |
| 2010s | 0.3% | 1.5% | 1.2% | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.2% | 3.1% | 2.9% | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, IBRD only or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 2.8% against 0.2% in IBRD only as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between IBRD only and Sudan?
- 2.6%, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Sudan?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do IBRD only and Sudan rank globally for forest rents?
- IBRD only ranks 27th and Sudan ranks 26th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.