Iceland vs United Arab Emirates: Forest rents
Iceland
0.0%
in 2021
United Arab Emirates
0.0%
in 2021
Iceland rank
183rd
United Arab Emirates rank
184th
Forest rents over time
- Iceland
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1975 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Iceland ranks 183rd and United Arab Emirates ranks 184th of 214 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | United Arab Emirates |
| 1980s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | United Arab Emirates |
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | United Arab Emirates |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, Iceland or United Arab Emirates?
- Iceland, at 0.0% against 0.0% in United Arab Emirates as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between Iceland and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.0%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and United Arab Emirates?
- 47 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2021.
- How do Iceland and United Arab Emirates rank globally for forest rents?
- Iceland ranks 183rd and United Arab Emirates ranks 184th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.