Kiribati vs Norway: Forest rents
Kiribati
0.0%
in 2021
Norway
0.0%
in 2021
Kiribati rank
133rd
Norway rank
135th
Forest rents over time
- Kiribati
- Norway
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Norway, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Norway ahead.
Kiribati ranks 133rd and Norway ranks 135th of 212 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 3 and Norway in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.2% | Norway |
| 1980s | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | Norway |
| 1990s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Norway |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, Kiribati or Norway?
- Kiribati, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Norway as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between Kiribati and Norway?
- 0.0%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Norway?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Kiribati and Norway rank globally for forest rents?
- Kiribati ranks 133rd and Norway ranks 135th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.