Lithuania vs Samoa: Forest rents
Lithuania
0.3%
in 2021
Samoa
0.3%
in 2021
Lithuania rank
88th
Samoa rank
85th
Forest rents over time
- Lithuania
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 0.3% against 0.3% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Samoa ahead.
Lithuania ranks 88th and Samoa ranks 85th of 213 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.0% | 1.5% | 0.5% | Samoa |
| 2000s | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.0% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.0% | Samoa |
| 2020s | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, Lithuania or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 0.3% against 0.3% in Lithuania as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between Lithuania and Samoa?
- 0.0%, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Samoa?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do Lithuania and Samoa rank globally for forest rents?
- Lithuania ranks 88th and Samoa ranks 85th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.