Malaysia vs OECD members: Forest rents
Malaysia
1.7%
in 2021
OECD members
0.0%
in 2021
Malaysia rank
42nd
OECD members rank
42nd
Forest rents over time
- Malaysia
- OECD members
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 1.7% against 0.0% in OECD members, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 34.3 times OECD members's.
Across all 52 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 42nd and OECD members ranks 42nd of 212 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | OECD members | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 23.1% | 0.2% | 22.9% | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 17.8% | 0.1% | 17.7% | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 10.0% | 0.1% | 9.9% | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 3.9% | 0.1% | 3.8% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 2.1% | 0.1% | 2.1% | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 0.1% | 1.7% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, Malaysia or OECD members?
- Malaysia, at 1.7% against 0.0% in OECD members as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between Malaysia and OECD members?
- 1.7%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and OECD members?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Malaysia and OECD members rank globally for forest rents?
- Malaysia ranks 42nd and OECD members ranks 42nd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.