Malaysia vs Suriname: Forest rents
Malaysia
1.7%
in 2021
Suriname
1.6%
in 2021
Malaysia rank
42nd
Suriname rank
43rd
Forest rents over time
- Malaysia
- Suriname
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 1.7% against 1.6% in Suriname, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 42nd and Suriname ranks 43rd of 212 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 23.1% | 1.1% | 22.0% | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 17.8% | 0.9% | 16.9% | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 10.0% | 0.7% | 9.2% | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 3.9% | 0.4% | 3.5% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 2.1% | 1.3% | 0.8% | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 1.6% | 0.2% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, Malaysia or Suriname?
- Malaysia, at 1.7% against 1.6% in Suriname as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between Malaysia and Suriname?
- 0.1%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Suriname?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Malaysia and Suriname rank globally for forest rents?
- Malaysia ranks 42nd and Suriname ranks 43rd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.