Malaysia vs Zimbabwe: Forest rents
Malaysia
1.7%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
1.8%
in 2021
Malaysia rank
42nd
Zimbabwe rank
41st
Forest rents over time
- Malaysia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1.8% against 1.7% in Malaysia, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 212 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 23.1% | 1.2% | 21.8% | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 17.8% | 1.5% | 16.3% | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 10.0% | 2.6% | 7.3% | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 3.9% | 4.7% | 0.8% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 2.1% | 2.9% | 0.7% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 2.0% | 0.3% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, Malaysia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1.8% against 1.7% in Malaysia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Malaysia and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest rents?
- Malaysia ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.