How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and Zimbabwe?

51 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) vs Zimbabwe: Forest rents

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)

0.1%

in 2021

Zimbabwe

1.8%

in 2021

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) rank

38th

Zimbabwe rank

41st

Forest rents over time

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1.8% against 0.1% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 1.7%.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 22.2 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)'s.

Across all 51 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 47 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.2%	1.2%	1.0%	Zimbabwe
1980s	0.1%	1.5%	1.4%	Zimbabwe
1990s	0.1%	2.7%	2.6%	Zimbabwe
2000s	0.1%	4.7%	4.6%	Zimbabwe
2010s	0.1%	2.9%	2.8%	Zimbabwe
2020s	0.1%	2.0%	2.0%	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest rents, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 1.8% against 0.1% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) as of 2021.
What is the difference in forest rents between Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and Zimbabwe?: 1.7%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and Zimbabwe?: 51 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest rents?: Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?: The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) vs Zimbabwe: Forest rents. Statizoid, drawing on The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-rents-percent-of-gdp/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-ida-and-ibrd/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forest-rents-percent-of-gdp/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-ida-and-ibrd/zimbabwe/">Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) vs Zimbabwe: Forest rents</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Forest rents (% of GDP)
Unit: % of GDP
Source: The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 262 places, 11,714 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 17 September 2026

Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.