OECD members vs Zimbabwe: Forest rents
OECD members
0.0%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
1.8%
in 2021
OECD members rank
42nd
Zimbabwe rank
41st
Forest rents over time
- OECD members
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1.8% against 0.0% in OECD members, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 36.7 times OECD members's.
Across all 52 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
OECD members ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 45 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | OECD members | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.2% | 1.2% | 1.1% | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 0.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 0.1% | 2.6% | 2.5% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 4.7% | 4.7% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 2.9% | 2.8% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 2.0% | 2.0% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, OECD members or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1.8% against 0.0% in OECD members as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between OECD members and Zimbabwe?
- 1.8%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Zimbabwe?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do OECD members and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest rents?
- OECD members ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.