Philippines vs Slovenia: Forest rents
Philippines
0.2%
in 2021
Slovenia
0.2%
in 2021
Philippines rank
100th
Slovenia rank
103rd
Forest rents over time
- Philippines
- Slovenia
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 100th and Slovenia ranks 103rd of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 3 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.3% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.2% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | Philippines |
| 2020s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, Philippines or Slovenia?
- Philippines, at 0.2% against 0.2% in Slovenia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between Philippines and Slovenia?
- 0.0%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Slovenia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do Philippines and Slovenia rank globally for forest rents?
- Philippines ranks 100th and Slovenia ranks 103rd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.