Sao Tome and Principe vs Zimbabwe: Forest rents
Sao Tome and Principe
1.9%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
1.8%
in 2021
Sao Tome and Principe rank
40th
Zimbabwe rank
41st
Forest rents over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 1.9% against 1.8% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 40th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 214 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.3% | 5.0% | 1.7% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 3.2% | 2.9% | 0.3% | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2020s | 1.9% | 2.0% | 0.1% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest rents, Sao Tome and Principe or Zimbabwe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 1.9% against 1.8% in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forest rents between Sao Tome and Principe and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Zimbabwe?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest rents?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 40th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Forest rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest rents are roundwood harvest times the product of regional prices and a regional rental rate.