Guinea vs United Republic of Tanzania: Forestry, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value Standard
Forestry, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value Standard over time
- Guinea
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 15,700 million SLC against 35 million SLC in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 15,665 million SLC.
That makes Guinea's figure about 448.6 times United Republic of Tanzania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
Guinea ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 47 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9,750 million SLC | 3,974 million SLC | 5,776 million SLC | Guinea |
| 2020s | 15,700 million SLC | 502 million SLC | 15,198 million SLC | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry, capital (central government expenditure) — value standard, Guinea or United Republic of Tanzania?
- Guinea, at 15,700 million SLC against 35 million SLC in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in forestry, capital (central government expenditure) — value standard between Guinea and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 15,665 million SLC, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2020.
- How do Guinea and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for forestry, capital (central government expenditure) — value standard?
- Guinea ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.