Republic of Moldova vs United Republic of Tanzania: Forestry, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value Standard
Forestry, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value Standard over time
- Republic of Moldova
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 259 million SLC against 35 million SLC in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 224 million SLC.
That makes Republic of Moldova's figure about 7.4 times United Republic of Tanzania's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Republic of Moldova ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 3 countries.
United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.5 million SLC | 496.41 million SLC | 481.91 million SLC | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 2010s | 8.99 million SLC | 2,210 million SLC | 2,201 million SLC | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 2020s | 71.98 million SLC | 177,984 million SLC | 177,912 million SLC | United Republic of Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry, capital (central government expenditure) — value standard, Republic of Moldova or United Republic of Tanzania?
- Republic of Moldova, at 259 million SLC against 35 million SLC in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forestry, capital (central government expenditure) — value standard between Republic of Moldova and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 224 million SLC, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Republic of Moldova and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for forestry, capital (central government expenditure) — value standard?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 3 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.