Republic of Moldova vs United Republic of Tanzania: Forestry, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value US$

Republic of Moldova
14.65 million USD
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
0.01 million USD
in 2024
Republic of Moldova rank
1st
United Republic of Tanzania rank
3rd

Forestry, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value US$ over time

  • Republic of Moldova
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0100200300400200220132024

How they compare

Republic of Moldova currently reports 14.65 million USD against 0.01 million USD in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 14.64 million USD.

That makes Republic of Moldova's figure about 1,465.0 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.

Republic of Moldova ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 3 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Republic of Moldova averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Moldova United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 1.3 million USD 0.375 million USD 0.93 million USD Republic of Moldova
2010s 0.6411 million USD 1.08 million USD 0.4367 million USD United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 4.04 million USD 73.97 million USD 69.93 million USD United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forestry, capital (central government expenditure) — value us$, Republic of Moldova or United Republic of Tanzania?
Republic of Moldova, at 14.65 million USD against 0.01 million USD in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in forestry, capital (central government expenditure) — value us$ between Republic of Moldova and United Republic of Tanzania?
14.64 million USD, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and United Republic of Tanzania?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
How do Republic of Moldova and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for forestry, capital (central government expenditure) — value us$?
Republic of Moldova ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 3 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Moldova vs United Republic of Tanzania: Forestry, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forestry-capital-central-government-expenditure-value-us/republic-of-moldova/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forestry-capital-central-government-expenditure-value-us/republic-of-moldova/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Republic of Moldova vs United Republic of Tanzania: Forestry, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value US$</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forestry, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value US$
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
50 places, 608 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.