Israel vs Pakistan: Forestry, Capital (general government expenditure) — Value Standard
Forestry, Capital (general government expenditure) — Value Standard over time
- Israel
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 9,384 million SLC against 1,017 million SLC in Israel, a difference of 8,367 million SLC.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 9.2 times Israel's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 3rd and Pakistan ranks 1st of 23 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 598.31 million SLC | 1,442 million SLC | 843.69 million SLC | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 782.69 million SLC | 6,513 million SLC | 5,730 million SLC | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry, capital (general government expenditure) — value standard, Israel or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 9,384 million SLC against 1,017 million SLC in Israel as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forestry, capital (general government expenditure) — value standard between Israel and Pakistan?
- 8,367 million SLC, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Pakistan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Israel and Pakistan rank globally for forestry, capital (general government expenditure) — value standard?
- Israel ranks 3rd and Pakistan ranks 1st of 23 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry, Capital (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.