Grenada vs Kyrgyzstan: Forestry, Capital (general government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015
Forestry, Capital (general government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 over time
- Grenada
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.2 million USD against 0.04 million USD in Grenada, a difference of 0.16 million USD.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 5.0 times Grenada's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 17th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 23 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.285 million USD | 0.1075 million USD | 0.1775 million USD | Grenada |
| 2020s | 0.0225 million USD | 0.0675 million USD | 0.045 million USD | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry, capital (general government expenditure) — value us$, 2015, Grenada or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 0.2 million USD against 0.04 million USD in Grenada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forestry, capital (general government expenditure) — value us$, 2015 between Grenada and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.16 million USD, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for forestry, capital (general government expenditure) — value us$, 2015?
- Grenada ranks 17th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 23 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry, Capital (general government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.