Brazil vs Poland: Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local

Brazil
36.62 million SLC
in 2024
Poland
30 million SLC
in 2023
Brazil rank
43rd
Poland rank
44th

Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local over time

  • Brazil
  • Poland
050100150200820162024

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 36.62 million SLC against 30 million SLC in Poland, a difference of 6.62 million SLC.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.2 times Poland's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 43rd and Poland ranks 44th of 66 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Poland Difference Ahead
2010s 114.17 million SLC 63.13 million SLC 51.04 million SLC Brazil
2020s 121.43 million SLC 14.31 million SLC 107.12 million SLC Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local, Brazil or Poland?
Brazil, at 36.62 million SLC against 30 million SLC in Poland as of 2024.
What is the difference in forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local between Brazil and Poland?
6.62 million SLC, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Poland?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Poland rank globally for forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local?
Brazil ranks 43rd and Poland ranks 44th of 66 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Poland: Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forestry-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local-currency/brazil/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forestry-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local-currency/brazil/poland/">Brazil vs Poland: Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
70 places, 888 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.